Site Planning in Tinemastes

Day One on Site in Tinemastes. Check out my assistant!

Day One on Site in Tinemastes. Check out my assistant!

Just back from a site visit to Costa Rica and I’m missing that lush landscape already.  Everything about Tinemastes is heavenly–the verdant hills where we’re planning to site the house, the sibilant sounds of the rainforest all day (and all night!) long, the waves thundering onto the beaches just below.  It’s truly magical, and spending time there gave me immediate insight into the deep affection my clients feel for their site. 

I feel it too, and it makes me that much more invested in making sure we’re siting the building(s) appropriately with regard to future development on site, which is complicated. This property will be a shared site and must accommodate several other structures, including a small house and garden for a very dear family friend whose vision to create a close-knit community of folks here (both full- and part-time tenants in common) is what drew my clients in.  Future residents will share the rich views and sweet air, but also responsibility for bringing power and potable water to the site (no small feat here in CR). They’ll also contribute to maintaining shared collective spaces to include a driveway, a pool and a yoga pavilion, so we want to plan with consideration for those resources and amenities.  Here are some early study images.  Pura Vida!



What's in your...Paint Stripper?

Methylene Chloride.jpg

I love seeing awareness and activism centering on reducing (and dare I hope, eliminating) noxious chemicals in household products.  It seems criminal that compounds proven to be harmful to human and environmental health continue to be included but (not disclosed and often not regulated!) for sale on the shelves of our grocery and home improvement stores.  Would you buy a paint stripper for a small home improvement project if you knew that that it has "a sweet, pleasant smell and emits highly toxic fumes" and has been linked to cancer, organ toxicity and more?  Can you imagine what happens when this chemical leaches into the water table or is spilled into the river running through your town?  Wouldn't you opt for a safer alternative if you were aware of these risks?  Curiosity may have killed the cat, but I'm a firm believer in the fact that it can keep us healthier and encourage us to affect change. 

From the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC):

Did you know that Lowe’s Home Improvement stores sell deadly paint strippers containing a chemical -- methylene chloride -- that has been linked to nearly 60 deaths nationwide?

Products this dangerous should not be on Lowe’s shelves.

Join me in urging Lowe’s CEO Robert Niblock to put consumer safety first and stop selling deadly paint strippers containing methylene chloride. https://on.nrdc.org/2H7Ck81

What's in My Foam? Testing for Flame Retardants in Your Furniture

Graphic courtesy of Duke University Foam Project / Superfund Research Center

Graphic courtesy of Duke University Foam Project / Superfund Research Center

Are you wondering whether your couch or your child's carseat is full of flame retardant chemicals?  It's a safe bet that, if it predates the Technical Bulletin 117 (TB113-2013) regulations that went into effect in January 2014, your couch or carseat foam may be steeped in potentially harmful chemicals.  Why are we concerned about the use of flame retardant chemicals in household products?  We've written at length about the link between these substances and potential health effects including respiratory issues, autoimmune conditions, and cancer.  And when flame retardants and the foam they saturate begin to break down over time, they accumulate in household dust where they can easily be inhaled or ingested.  So it makes sense to prioritize replacing household items with confirmed levels of flame retardant chemicals. 

But how do you know if the polyurethane foam (PUF) if your furniture, mattress or carseat contains confirmed flame retardants?  Current regulations do NOT require manufacturers to disclose what kinds of flame retardants are used in their products, so consumers have no way of knowing what chemicals their purchases contain without laboratory testing.  Luckily, The Duke University Foam Project is currently examining the use of flame retardant chemicals in furniture.  Duke's Superfund Research Center will accept foam samples from US households for lab testing--all free of charge (minus nominal shipping charges).  Instructions for preparing and mailing samples can be found here, and results can be expected via mail about 6 to 8 weeks after the sample is received by the lab.

I'm currently waiting on test results for several samples from around my own house.  Fingers crossed for clean results.  And if not, at least I'll have direction on what to prioritize for replacement.  Happy testing to you, too!

 

IN THE NEWS: Understanding New Tariffs on Imported Solar Panels

pexels-photo-421888.jpeg

Last week, President Trump announced plans to impose punitive duties on foreign-made solar panels.  The proposed tariffs, slated to begin at a steep 30% of the cost of imported panels, will remain in effect for four years, tapering to 15% by 2022.  Given that over 85% of solar panels installed in the US in 2016 were imported (mostly of Chinese origin), these proposed duties stand to sting many impending projects.  So just how profoundly could such penalties affect the solar industry in the near future, and in what ways? 

  • Decreased renewable generation.  Roughly 25% of all new power capacity (utility scale) installed in 2017 was solar.  Proposed duties are likely to affect the commercial market most, increasing the cost of installation by roughly $0.11 per watt, or around 10%.  For smaller residential installations, those figures are less likely to cancel projects outright.  But at the utility scale, they could do just that.  By one estimate, 5 to 8 GW of power generation could be at stake over the next four years.
  • Slowed Job Growth (and potential loss).  In 2016, over 250,000 individuals worked in the solar industry.  "Solar panel installer" ranked as the fastest growing job in 2016, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  While the new tariffs claim to encourage more growth in the domestic solar job market by boosting the manufacture of domestic panels, only about 15% of industry jobs are in the manufacturing sector.  So boosting jobs in this sector would require major workforce retraining, since installers have a distinct skill set not closely related to assembly line processes.  It's also true that new domestic solar panel manufacturing facilities would likely be highly automated.  So new job generation would be limited at best.  The Solar Foundation's projections show a potential loss of 28,000 jobs in 2018 alone due to decreased demand attributed to the new tariffs. 
  • Languishing Market Growth and Innovation.  The consensus seems to be that there are better ways to promote domestic growth in the renewable energy market.  Punitive tariffs do nothing to cultivate and sustain a culture of innovation in the renewable energy marketplace--which is how China won its marketplace domination in the first place.  These new policies are shortsighted and self-limiting

Stay tuned for more on how new tax code changes will further affect renewable energy generation investment and growth.  Spoiler alert: It's not good.

 

 

 

 

Hello, 2018.

mz7JdnPJS1e3z8e%25eUxU0g_thumb_5df6.jpg

It feels amazing to be geographically in the same place I was a year ago after the previous year of what seemed like constant motion. But feels like so much has changed even as I’ve remained in one place. New baby, new projects, new clients. I love that this last year did not include a cross country move, since it freed up time to invest in new personal and professional projects. Stay tuned as I update the website to share more work-related news, and apologies in advance for the delayed rollout. I haven’t found many spare moments lately to complete ‘non-essential’ (i.e. no life or death deadline looming) work. More to come…

A Long Lost Howdy From HAABITT!

pexels-photo-785171.jpeg

It's back to researching, blogging and otherwise collaborating after a sweet time away with my new babe.  The work of connecting designers and builders with more responsible building material choices is even more important now that I have one more future to consider.  

I'm thrilled that one of my first tasks back has been planning to talk about my work at HAABITT with the Seacoast Womens Giving Circle.  SWGC is an organization of over 150 motivated and engaged women in my community that pools resources to give generously in areas of need in our community as identified through an intense period of collective research and discussion.  This year, SWGC has chosen to focus on environmental issues, learning, giving and acting--according to their mission--on issues of urgent concern so close to my own work and heart.  Stay tuned for an update and photos after the event!

Hello again, East Coast.

And I’m back.  Back on the east coast, back in New England, back to business.  I loved my time in Portland, but for a variety of personal and professional reasons, I’m also happy to be back in familiar territory among wonderful friends and colleagues.  The benefit of two cross country moves in the span of just fifteen months is that it’s easy to fall right back into step with a professional and personal New England network already built, even as I find my way in a new city (Portsmouth, NH).

I’ll continue to partner on west coast endeavors where it makes sense–including ongoing work on The Valhalla–as I cultivate new clients and relationships here in New England.  I’m also excited to launch a new project focused on increasing access in the design and construction markets to more sustainable, healthier building materials, conceived in collaboration with my longtime colleague and friend from Harvard and Northeastern, Rebecca Whidden.  We call ourselves HAABITT, pronounced habit, and an anagram for habitat, since we’re focused on working at the intersection of good habits and healthy habitats.  We offering consulting services to consumers and designers, and aim to help increase access to and demand for building products produced in ways that aim to reduce waste and environmental impact, increase health along the chain of production, and limit toxic exposure to the inhabitants of spaces where they are installed.  Please visit us at www.haabitt.com.

IN THE NEWS: EPA's Air Pollution Standards Aren't Good Enough

In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on Wednesday, researchers concluded that EPA's current standards for air pollution contribute to thousands of preventable deaths each year.  Despite that fact that the Clean Air Act and other legislation has been helping to reduce air pollution in the US for decades, "our air is contaminated," says study lead Francesca Dominici, a professor of biostatistics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.  "We are now providing bullet-proof evidence that we are breathing harmful air," she says.

It’s hard not to panic at this news, knowing that the Trump Administration’s early actions have sought to dismantle President Obama’s Clean Power Plan and its efforts to control air pollution, in part, by limiting emissions from coal-fired power plants.  Says Jeffrey Drazen, NEJM’s editor-in-chief, "If you look at what's happening in the Trump administration, the general direction is not to clean up the air.”  

The ambitious study analyzed air pollution data with unprecedented detail, overlaying data from federal air monitoring stations and satellites to produce zip code-specific analyses of air pollution and its effect on mortality rates.  Over 60 million Medicare patients, spanning from 2000-2012, were included in the exhaustive research. The study estimates that conservative improvements in air quality, amounting to 1 microgram of particulate matter per cubic foot below existing standards, could save roughly 12,000 lives every year.  Dominici concludes that "it's very strong, compelling evidence that currently, the safety standards are not safe enough."

The study also found that African Americans and low income individuals appear to be disproportionately affected by excessive particulate matter in the air. "So this is a warning,” Drazen notes, “that if we don't clean up the air, the people who are going to bear that burden are the poor and the disadvantaged, more than the rich and well-off."

Heeding the impact of building material manufacturing--including factory emissions and their effects on our air quality--makes sense for all of us.  “Architects have a greater ability to improve public health than medical professionals,” professes Dr. Claudia Miller, an assistant dean at the University of Texas School of Medicine.  We take that charge with incredible gravity, and we continue to research and recommend building material companies and products that forward responsible manufacturing practices and take initiative to reduce risk for factory employees, their neighbors, consumers and the planet.

 

PRODUCT CONSIDERATIONS: Be Picky About Your Wallboard

It pays to be picky about wallboard (aka drywall, sheetrock or plasterboard) when you’re renovating or building from the ground up.  Wallboard is made from gypsum, a naturally-occurring mineral known scientifically as calcium sulfate dihydrate.  Though many think of wallboard as an inert building material, it’s important to know that “gypsum” building products sold in the US aren’t all the same when it comes to environmental impact and chemical content.

Naturally-occurring gypsum is found in sedimentary rock formations in over 85 countries worldwide.  It is abundant in the US, and mining operations to extract gypsum occur in over 17 states.  Once extracted, natural gypsum is crushed into a fine powder and then heated to remove as much moisture as possible.  The resulting calcined gypsum becomes the basis for drywall: compacted gypsum sandwiched between two layers of tough paperboard.

Synthetic gypsum uses a process referred to as Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) to recycle byproducts of fossil fuel power plants into manmade gypsum products.  Emissions recovered from power plant flue stacks are reclaimed to produce over half of all US gypsum wallboard, a practice that has been in place for over 30 years.  And while natural and FGD wallboard have the same chemical composition, they aren’t exactly equivalent.

Synthetic gypsum wallboard was imported from China in mass quantities in the early- to mid-2000s to bridge the gap in US wallboard production and heightened demand during the housing boom at that time.  And following the catastrophic effects of the 2004 hurricane season in the southeast, a sudden and widespread demand for wallboard also spurred the use of imported products.  Chinese drywall has been linked to contamination and outgassing of sulfurous gases and volatile chemicals, and has caused health problems in more than 20,000 affected households in the southeastern US.

Domestic wallboard products have not been linked to the same indoor air quality issues as imports, and US manufacturers of FGD wallboard tout the decreased environmental impact of their products because they recycle material from power plants that otherwise wouldn’t be used.  But when discarded FGD wallboard ends up in a landfill, it can still release harmful gases and leach heavy metals and biocides (used to prevent mold growth in moisture-prone areas) into the groundwater supply.  And given that drywall comprises up to 15% of all construction and demolition debris, the potential environmental impact is profound.

What can you do to minimize chemical exposure and environmental impact when specifying drywall for your project?

Consider Alternatives: Where practicality, design and budget allow, consider alternative wall finishes that eliminate the need for wallboard.  We love using reclaimed wood paneling or FSC-certified paneling products wherever possible.

Go Local: Opt for domestically-produced products.  US regulations require minimum safety standards as set forth in the Drywall Safety Act.  Note that the safeguards outlined in this legislation are minimal, but it’s still worth specifying a domestically-produced drywall product.

Limit Waste: Prefer gypsum wallboard products with some post-consumer recycled content, and calculate needed amounts carefully to avoid wasteful overages.  In an ideal world, we’d all be using virgin gypsum products to minimize our exposure to toxins, but both environmental impact and budget make this prospect unrealistic.

Control Construction Dust: Take care on the jobsite to wear protective gear and limit exposure to dust.  If possible, avoid cutting drywall inside, and clean up construction dust promptly and carefully.

Do Your Research: Prefer Greenguard or ULE-certified gypsum board to avoid indoor air quality issues.  Take care to treat seams with mudding, taping and caulking products with no- or low-VOC formulations.  Use VOC-free primers and paints, and consider formulations that seal in toxins to further limit exposure.

Avoid Chemical Additives: In wet locations, be wary of products that claim to inhibit mold growth by incorporating biocides.  Instead, consider fiberglass-coated products as outlined in GreenSpec where you might expect water penetration (flood-prone lower levels, and in bathrooms underneath tile application).

 

CHANGING HAABITTS: Makeup as a Model for Building Material Safety

Did you know that current federal laws do not require cosmetic products and ingredients (with the exception of color additives) to gain FDA approval before they are available for purchase on the shelves of your local pharmacy?  That’s right, folks: your favorite moisturizer, perfume, lipstick, nail polish and face makeup may contain any number of harmful substances that have not been reviewed by the FDA for safety (or efficacy).  It’s discouraging to think that, with all of the changes you might be making to your home environment to limit your family’s exposure to toxins, what’s lurking in your vanity drawers might be working against you.

Current federal regulations place the burden of disclosing product ingredients and ensuring their safety on cosmetic manufacturers, requiring no third party testing to validate claims of safety or efficacy.  Is that news to you, too?  For ages, we assumed that the government was somehow safeguarding us against the harmful substances in the products we use most frequently and intimately.  But the truth is that cosmetic manufacturers can include almost any chemical ingredient in their formulations without a federally-regulated formal review or testing process.

As if worrying about harmful chemicals in our indoor environments wasn’t enough, we’re also keeping tabs on the progress of proposed legislation that would better regulate toxins in our cosmetics and personal care products.  In late 2015, Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced a proposed bill called the Personal Care Products Safety Act that would compel the FDA to better regulate harmful ingredients in the products we use everyday.  Now cosponsored by Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), the proposed legislation seeks to establish a safety review process for cosmetic ingredients, and would give the FDA further power to protect consumer safety in the realm of personal care products.  

The Personal Care Products Safety Act would mandate that cosmetic manufacturers register with the FDA and adhere to reporting and disclosure guidelines that would restrict harmful products on the cosmetic marketplace.  The proposed legislation could also allow the FDA to recall products with proven harmful ingredients if manufacturers refuse to do so of their own accord.    

According to Feinstein: “Despite the universal use of these products, none of their ingredients have been independently evaluated for safety. This puts consumers’ health at risk and we urgently need to update the nearly 80-year-old safety rules.”

Tell your senators you support consumer safety, both in the cosmetics realm and on the homefront when it comes to the regulation of harmful substances in our building materials.  We’re watching this piece of legislation as a model for making the disclosure of building material ingredients and their health implications more transparent to consumers, designers and builders alike.  We need better regulation of harmful substances on the building materials market, and seeing progress on parallel fronts like this one tells us that it’s possible!

PRODUCTS WE LOVE: Rubio Monocoat for Wood Floors

Are you contemplating the installation of new hardwood floors or wall paneling?  Or are your existing wood floors looking worn and dated?  We’ve recently discovered (and tested!) a wood oil product worth raving about: Rubio’s Monocoat Natural Oil Finish is a non-toxic, linseed-based product that we love.  Manufactured in Germany, Monocoat is applied in a single coat to raw wood floors (or wall panels, countertops or furniture) and allowed to cure for a short time.  In about 15 minutes, the wood reacts with the top surface of the wood, bonding permanently to the wear layer and creating a lasting (and beautiful!) finish.  Any excess oil is wiped or buffed off after the reaction occurs, and no sanding or additional coats of oil are required.  The oil takes about 21 days to fully cure, but it can be walked on (preferably over a layer of paper or cardboard) 24 hours after initial oil application and buffing.  Rubio offers a formula that shortens curing time (called Monocoat 2C) to just 7 days.

 Aesthetics: We’re loving the pale, rustic results we achieved using Monocoat 2C in white on unfinished white oak flooring.  It reminds us of the patina on traditional wide plank Scandinavian oak floors that we’re constantly lusting after, and casts a contemporary and timeless look to almost any space.  It feels almost too good to be true that we can achieve such beautiful results with a product that doesn’t compromise our indoor air quality or the health of those involved in its manufacturing processes!  

Toxicity: Monocoat’s primary ingredient is linseed oil, also known as flaxseed oil.  Many folks ingest flaxseed oil to bone up on Omega 3 intake (though it might not provide the right kinds of Omega 3s to be worthwhile), so we had a feeling using it on our floors would be okay.  But we researched linseed oil thoroughly just to be sure.  As suspected, pure linseed oil is nontoxic in both its raw and boiled states.  Raw linseed oil is the same thing as flaxseed oil, the edible form.  It’s nontoxic, but some nutritional sources warn that taking it in moderation makes sense given the small amounts of naturally-occurring cyanide released when it is processed.  For interior finish applications, raw linseed oil takes a long time to dry.  To accelerate drying time and to produce unIform, viscous coatings, linseed oil is boiled at about 300C for several days.  The process, called polymerization, results in true “boiled linseed oil”, also called stand oil.  This type of linseed oil is also nontoxic, BUT beware of products called “boiled linseed oil” that are not 100% linseed oil.  Many contain hardeners, plasticizers and even heavy metals that make it act like true boiled linseed oil for a fraction of the cost and time.   

 Rubio discloses Monocoat’s ingredients as follows: natural plant oils, modified plant oils, natural waxes, modified natural waxes, non-aromatic hydrocarbons, lead-free catalytic dryers, and organic pigments.  Ideally, we’d like more specific disclosure that what’s listed above.  What are “modified” plant oils and natural waxes, and what to the modifiers contain?  We’ve reached out to Rubio for further detail and will update this post when we receive clarification.  In the meantime, we are heartened to know that the product emits zero VOCs, and that it does not include any of the following: formaldehyde, ammonia, acetone, solvents, preservatives, odor-masking agents, chemical residuals, and heavy metal drying agents like arsenic, beryllium, chromium, cadmium, nickel and lead.  A careful review of Monocoat’s MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) shows very limited risk in using the product.  And while the product does emit an odor during and immediately following application, we actually found the smell to be borderline pleasant (a touch of almond and a dash of cherry, anyone?), and it dissipated markedly within the first 72 hours after application in our tests (for the original formula without the 2C accelerator).  

 Application: We love how simple Monocoat is to use.  We're still wondering how it's possible to achieve a beautiful, permanent, nontoxic finish without multiple coatings or sanding sessions.  For preparation, unfinished wood surfaces should be lightly sanded, wiped clean of wood dust, and allowed to dry completely.  Then it’s as simple as applying the Monocoat to a small section of wood at a time (roughly 10 SF) using a squirt bottle to control volume application.  We then rubbed the oil around for even coverage, and waited 5-10 minutes for the wood and the oil to react before wiping off the excess with a cloth rag and buffing.  The oil cleans up with soap, water and vigorous scrubbing, though we recommend working with protective gloves.

Longevity: We’re pleased to report that after over six months of regular use, our experience with Monocoat-treated surfaces remains positive.  Rubio states that the product can be reapplied to refresh floors as needed and cover scratches, but that an initial installation should last 3-6 years in a residential setting.  We also love that, unlike most prefinished wood flooring products on the market, Monocoat does not contain aluminum oxide, a potentially harmful hardener that is released into the air in tiny particles when sanded.  

CHANGING HAABITTS: Don't Buy It, Borrow It!

Happy Weekend!  On Fridays, we like to post fun tidbits that help encourage our readers to get out and have fun in their free time without buying a slew of new gear (or otherwise driving up demand for new products in a world that is already too burdened by it!).  

 We recently learned about The Sharing Depot in Toronto and wanted to celebrate their mission and their efforts here on our blog.  Founded by a pair of environmental and economic activists eager to build community, The Sharing Depot taps into the city's sharing economy in order to reduce the demand for stuff at the scale of an entire urban community.  Begun in 2012 as a tool lending library, The Sharing Depot now boasts over 2,200 members and has loaned out over 25,000 tools since its inception.  It now also maintains a robust inventory of camping gear, sporting goods, toys, party supplies, and games--all accessible for a week at a time in exchange for a modest annual membership fee.

 We love that The Sharing Depot aims to help its members “own less and experience more” by saving its members money, eliminating the storage space required to house gear that only gets used periodically, and reducing the time needed to manage owning so many superfluous items that cause us to spend more time managing stuff and less time enjoying life.  These goals also serve a greater mission: to spare the planet from the profound impact of duplicitous ownership.  The Sharing Depot makes a measurable dent in reducing the resource load required to mine natural resources and manufacturing new goods, to package and transport them, and ultimately, to store these these goods in landfills when they become obsolete.  

 We’re thrilled to hear about an effort that encourages the sharing of communal resources and asks its members to reconsider longstanding relationships with their own possessions.  We could all use more of this provocation, and we hope the trend catches on in other communities!

BEST PRACTICES: Organic Cotton Textiles

For every nine ounces of cotton—the amount in an average T-shirt—growers use an average of 17 teaspoons of chemical fertilizers and nearly a teaspoon of active ingredients, including pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and defoliants [courtesy of N…

For every nine ounces of cotton—the amount in an average T-shirt—growers use an average of 17 teaspoons of chemical fertilizers and nearly a teaspoon of active ingredients, including pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and defoliants [courtesy of NWF.org]

At the end of last week, we focused on simple, immediate changes you can make at home to reduce your exposure to toxins.  Those changes didn’t require the purchase or acquisition of big ticket items or fuel market demand for new products.  While we’re necessarily in the business of consumerism as designers, we advocate first for reuse and repurposing whenever we can.  We make every effort to recommend new products judiciously and responsibly only when necessary.

This week, we're talking about midscale changes--those that require some investment, but not a radical rethinking of building systems or personal/family priorities--that can make a big difference in your exposure to toxins at home and your ecological impact beyond.  Though our professional work keeps us predominantly in the realm of talking about building materials and products, we do a lot of thinking on the personal front about those items that we come into intimate contact with everyday, and their potential impact on our families and our world.  

We wear textiles all day and sleep on them all night, which means that we’re in close physical contact with some sort of fabric almost twenty-four hours per day.  It also means that the demand for these items is high, especially given rising disposable income, urbanization and population growth in both established markets like the US and emerging markets like India and Mexico.  One study projects that the global textile market will reach approximately $1,237 Billion USD by 2025.  

Given the scale of that market, it makes sense to us to be informed about the best choices for both our families and our planet when it comes to purchasing textiles.  The US Cotton industry launched an ongoing  successful ad campaign in the early 1990s, complete with a ballad performed by Aaron Neville (and subsequently Miranda Lambert and others), that made “the fabric of our lives” feel like the only natural, wholesome choice for our homes.  But the truth is that cotton cultivation requires more pesticides, fertilizers and defoliants than almost any other crop.  According to National Wildlife Federation research,

For every nine ounces of cotton—the amount in an average T-shirt—growers use an average of 17 teaspoons of chemical fertilizers and nearly a teaspoon of active ingredients, including pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and defoliants.

 NWF reports that the EPA categorizes 7 of the 15 most commonly-used cotton industry pesticides as “possible,” “likely,” “probable,” or “known” human carcinogens.  And unfortunately those toxins persist in our environment, in the textiles themselves, and ultimately in our own bodies.  Chemicals sprayed on cotton crops often kill birds in surrounding areas (some biologists estimate the casualties to number in the millions), and runoff from cotton fields inevitably finds its way into our watersheds where it kills fish (up to 240,000 in one 1995 Alabama event), and enter our own water supply.  

It’s also true that only about 35% of harvested cotton is processed into cloth.  The remaining two thirds often find their way into our diet.  The seed, which is ground to produce cottonseed oil, is used in packaged products as diverse as baked goods, chips and snacks, salad dressings and marinades.  Cotton meal (crushed seeds and hulls) are often fed to dairy and beef cattle, and gin trash (leaves, stems, etc) are also sometimes fed to livestock where the high pesticide levels they harbor get passed on in our food chain.

What can we do to avoid or mitigate these risks?  The organic cotton market--which cultivates cotton without the use of synthetic pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, defoliants and fertilizers--is a rapidly emerging market.  When you can, support its growth by purchasing Global Organic Textile Standard-certified cotton products (bedsheets, towels, apparel, drapery and upholstery, etc).  The GOTS certification provides a clear set of environmental and social standards to “define world-wide recognized requirements that ensure organic status of textiles, from harvesting of the raw materials, through environmentally and socially responsible manufacturing up to labelling in order to provide a credible assurance to the end consumer.”  Note that current GOTS standards maintain that products comprising at least 70% organic fibers are eligible for the certification, so read labels carefully if you’re looking to eliminate all agricultural chemicals from cotton at home.

Buying GOTS-certified textiles and supporting the growing movement towards a preference for organic cotton products means that you’re affecting change on a number of scales, protecting your family from potentially harmful chemicals locally, and advocating for healthier, more sustainable agricultural practices worldwide.  We like Target’s line of organic cotton towels and sheets by Threshold (the most affordable option we’ve found), as well as the more luxurious options available at West Elm, Pottery Barn, and Coyuchi.

CHANGING HAABITTS: Five Easy Ways to Reduce Toxins Indoors

Exposure to toxic chemicals these days is unfortunately inevitable!  We come into contact with harmful substances every day at work, in transit, at home, and in most retail, recreational and industrial environments in between.  Exposure risks include absorption through the skin, oral ingestion, and breathing in airborne particulate.  Given that we spend almost 90% of our time indoors, it makes sense to take steps to limit exposure in our home and work environments.  Though overhauling these spaces entirely isn’t easy or realistic, there are a number of small, immediate changes that can be made to limit toxic exposure at home and at work.  Try these five to affect immediate change:

  1. Go Shoeless.  By removing your shoes at the door, you can limit the spread of chemicals and bacteria riding on your soles.  One EPA study demonstrates that herbicides can be easily tracked inside on the soles of shoes, and that resulting exposure to chemicals can rival exposure levels endured when eating conventional (non-organic) fruits and vegetables.  Illness-causing bacteria (including E. coli and coliform) often hitchhike in on our shoes, as found in a University of Arizona study (and cosponsored by Rockport Shoe Company).  It’s also true that lead dust is often tracked inside on shoes.

  2. Work to Eliminate Dust.  This is a tough one, but it’s important because according to a 2016 joint study by Harvard and George Washington Schools of Public Health, household and office dust often contains toxic particulate--including flame retardants, phthalates, phenols, lead, herbicides and pesticides, soot, and more.  Invest in a HEPA-filtered vacuum cleaner, change or clean the bag and filter as soon as they are exhausted, and run the machine as often as you can.  Where the vacuum isn’t practical, use damp rags to wipe dust in place of feather dusters.

  3. Introduce Fresh (filtered) Air.  If air quality is decent in your neighborhood, open your windows for 10 minutes every day to dilute the indoor environment.  You’ll be addressing airborne chemicals, including VOCs and formaldehyde, bacteria and viruses, radon gas and more.  If the air quality in your area is not acceptable, consider installing air filters in the rooms you spend the most time in (especially the bedrooms).  You might also invest in a ventilation device that introduces filtered fresh air mechanically, via either an an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV) or a Heat Recovery Ventilator (HRV) unit.  

  4. Use Cleaning Products Carefully.  Many conventional cleaning products contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other noxious chemicals.  Opt for vinegar or hydrogen peroxide in place of bleach as a disinfectant, and use lemon juice and baking soda to tackle tough stains in the kitchen and bath.  When you work to eliminate dust and make your indoor environment a shoeless one, you’ll be reducing dirt and grime in the first place, and will likely need fewer cleaners to do the job.

  5. Ventilate Well When Cooking and Heating.  Combustion appliances (those that use fuel to heat) require expertly installed venting directly to the exterior.  Be sure that you use your exhaust fan when cooking, that you open the flue before using your fireplace, and that your chimney and furnace or boiler vents are clear of obstruction.  

Stay tuned for suggestions on how to prioritize larger-scale (and more expensive) modifications to your indoor environment!

BEST PRACTICES: Avoiding Flame Retardants in Kids' Furniture and Mattresses

Reduce exposure to flame retardants and other harmful chemicals by avoiding upholstered products (especially those stuffed with polyurethane foam!)

Reduce exposure to flame retardants and other harmful chemicals by avoiding upholstered products (especially those stuffed with polyurethane foam!)

Did you know that fire retardants can cause deficits in motor skills, learning, memory and behavior? And that they are linked to higher cancer rates?  And that they are common ingredients in products designed specifically for kids? Yikes! To find safer options, look for products that don't include PBDEs or TDCIPP ("Tris"), both of which can enter the body though inhalation or dermal contact (and let's face it, when have you ever met a kiddo who doesn't touch *everything*?)  

Most manufacturers don't readily volunteer information, but avoiding all products upholstered with foam (especially polyurethane foam) is a good start.  In your nursery, investing in a crib mattress made primarily with wool (naturally flame retardant) and/or organic cotton (which tends to smolder and can be treated with nontoxic flame retardants to meet current fire protection regulations) makes good sense to us, given how many hours young children spend in contact with their sleep surfaces!

IN THE NEWS: Leaving the Paris Climate Accord Isn't the Answer

President Trump has made official his intentions to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement.  But today's groundswell of resistance to this reckless decision fortifies our resolve.  World leaders, prominent CEOs, US city officials, and celebrities have all vociferously protested Trump's announcement yesterday, sending a clear message to the White House that stewardship for our planet and progress on climate change initiatives will persist--and thrive.  "One man cannot destroy our progress," professes former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and French President Emmanuel Macron urges, "Make Our Planet Great Again."  Let's continue to stay above the vindictive and petty presidential fray, advocating for global environmental collaboration and progress.

 

CHANGING HAABITTS: Let's get writing!

Download this and other templates at www.postcardsfromthepeople.com

Download this and other templates at www.postcardsfromthepeople.com

Ready to take action against yesterday's executive order from the White House that aims to recent progress on climate change initiatives in the US and worldwide?  Grab one of the great designs from Hear My Voice: Postcards from the People, a host of beautiful and pithy correspondence vehicles designed pro-bono by concerned designer-citizens. Conceived by a designer who seems to feel as distressed about this administration's attitude toward the environment as we are, Postcards from the People provides you with an easy way to express your political priorities and preoccupations to your legislative representatives--in a sharp and distinctive way.  Happy writing!